Skip to content
ce85204.com

OPRP — Operational Prerequisite Programme

Updated 2026-07-12 · Reviewed by: Redazione ce85204 — revisione editoriale assistita da AI (2026-07-12)

An OPRP (operational prerequisite programme) is an ISO 22000 control measure that addresses a significant hazard without the measurable critical limit typical of a CCP. It sits in an intermediate position between prerequisites (PRPs) and critical control points (CCPs).

At a glance

  • The OPRP is a category of the ISO 22000 standard, not a term of Regulation (EC) 852/2004: it controls a significant hazard with a targeted control measure.
  • It sits in between: more stringent than a general prerequisite (PRP), less than a CCP.
  • It applies when a hazard is significant but does not admit a measurable critical limit in real time with immediate corrective action.
  • It requires action criteria, planned monitoring and defined actions, but not necessarily a numeric critical limit like the CCP.
  • In the EU framework it still falls within procedures based on HACCP principles Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004.

Commentary

Origin and definition

The term OPRP does not appear in Regulation (EC) 852/2004: it originates in the international standard ISO 22000, dedicated to food safety management systems. ISO 22000 distinguishes three levels of control: PRPs (general prerequisites, basic hygiene conditions), OPRPs (operational prerequisite programmes) and CCPs (critical control points). The OPRP is defined as a control measure, or combination of measures, applied to prevent or reduce to an acceptable level a significant food-safety hazard, where that hazard is not controlled by a CCP.

The intermediate position

The difference between the three levels is best grasped in a table:

FeaturePRPOPRPCCP
Addresses a specific significant hazardnoyesyes
Measurable critical limitnoaction criteria, not always numericyes, always
Monitoringgeneralplannedcontinuous or systematic
Loss of controlnot immediately detectable on a single batchassessed over the wholedetectable and correctable on the single batch

The OPRP arose from the practical need to place those measures that are clearly aimed at a significant hazard — and therefore not reducible to a mere prerequisite — but that do not lend themselves to a critical limit observable in real time with corrective action on the single batch, and so lack the full features of the CCP. A recurring example is the validated washing of vegetables intended to be eaten raw: it reduces the microbial load but does not eliminate it against a measurable batch-by-batch critical limit.

Relationship with EU law

Regulation (EC) 852/2004 neither requires adoption of ISO 22000 nor uses the PRP/OPRP/CCP classification: it requires permanent procedures "based on the HACCP principles" Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004, leaving the operator organisational freedom. The OPRP is therefore a useful conceptual tool — adopted by those who certify their system to ISO 22000 or GFSI schemes — but in the EU framework what matters is that every significant hazard is actually identified and controlled, with documentation commensurate with the business Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004. During official controls the authority verifies the substance of the control, not the label attached to the measure. In our view, for small businesses the ISO three-way split is often an overload: the operationally relevant distinction remains that between what prerequisites control and what requires a CCP.

Common errors

  • Believing the OPRP is required by Regulation 852/2004. It is not: it is a category of the voluntary ISO 22000 standard. The Regulation requires procedures based on HACCP principles, without imposing this classification Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004.
  • Using the OPRP to "downgrade" a genuine CCP. If a hazard admits a measurable critical limit with correction on the single batch, it is a CCP: labelling it an OPRP to reduce monitoring burdens is a methodological error.
  • Neglecting validation and monitoring of the OPRP. The OPRP too addresses a significant hazard and must be documented and verified, as part of the HACCP procedures Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004.

Frequently asked questions

What is an OPRP?

An OPRP (operational prerequisite programme) is, in the ISO 22000 standard, a control measure applied to prevent or reduce to an acceptable level a significant hazard that is not managed by a CCP. It sits in an intermediate position between prerequisites and critical control points.

Is the OPRP required by Regulation 852/2004?

No. The term belongs to the voluntary ISO 22000 standard. Regulation (EC) 852/2004 requires procedures based on HACCP principles Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 without imposing the PRP/OPRP/CCP classification.

What is the difference between an OPRP and a CCP?

A CCP has a measurable critical limit and allows loss of control to be detected and corrected on the single batch. An OPRP addresses a significant hazard with action criteria and planned monitoring, but without that critical limit observable in real time.

What is the difference between an OPRP and a PRP?

A PRP is a general hygiene condition, not tied to a specific significant hazard. An OPRP is instead targeted at a significant hazard identified by the hazard analysis, and therefore requires validation and planned monitoring.

Do I need OPRPs to comply in Europe?

No. Compliance with Regulation (EC) 852/2004 is achieved with procedures based on HACCP principles Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004; the ISO classification is useful for those certifying their system to ISO 22000, but it is not a legal requirement.

Can washing vegetables be an OPRP?

In the ISO 22000 logic, yes: the validated washing of vegetables to be eaten raw reduces the microbial load but usually does not eliminate it against a measurable batch-by-batch critical limit, so it is classified as an OPRP rather than a CCP.

Sources

Drafting and review

ce85204 editorial team. Draft generated with AI from primary sources; editorial review AI-assisted (see methodology).